组合赋权下的装备质量状态信息融合评估方法
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

(1. 海军航空工程学院兵器科学与技术系,山东烟台264001;2. 火箭军工程大学士官学院,山东青州262500)

作者简介:

安进(1988-), 女, 博士生, 从事装备综合保障的研究;徐廷学(1962-), 男, 教授, 博士生导师, 从事装备综合保障等研究.

通讯作者:

E-mail: 137331253@qq.com

中图分类号:

TJ760

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(51605487);国防预研基金项目(401080102).


Equipment quality condition assessment under fusion information based on combination weighting
Author:
Affiliation:

(1. Department of Ordnance and Technology,Naval Aeronautical and Astronautical University, Yantai264001,China;2. School of Morale,The Rockets Army Engineering University,Qingzhou262500,China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    研究装备质量评估中指标优化、权重确定、评估方法选取等问题.首先运用改进的群层次分析法(IGAHP)选取通用特性指标、测试数据指标作为状态评估的二级指标;在对质量状态进行定性划分的基础上,分别采用IGAHP、CRITIC(criteria improved through inter-criteria correlation)等方法对状态评估三级指标进行遴选和权重分析;然后,提出改进证据推理(ER)方法进行通用特性指标的评估,并采用CRITIC方法,基于客观权重进行测试指标降维优化,对各评估结果进行改进ER融合;最后通过算例验证所提出方法的有效性和优越性.研究结果表明:IGAHP-CRITIC组合赋权方法可有效综合主客观权重信息;通过指标优化可降低评估的维数和复杂度;考虑证据冲突的改进ER方法可有效降低评估的不确定性和不完备性.

    Abstract:

    In equipment quality assessment, the problems of index optimization, weight determination and selection of assessment methods are discussed. Firstly, the improved group analytic hierarchy process(IGAHP) is used to select the general performance index and the testing data index as the second index of condition assessment. On the basis of qualitative division of the quality condition, the IGAHP and CRITIC methods are used to select and analyze the third level indicators of the assessment system. After that, an improved evidence reasoning(ER) approach is proposed to evaluate the general performance indicators, the CRITIC method based on objective weight is used to reduce the dimensionality of the testing data indicators, and the results are integrated by using the improve ER approach. Finally, the validity and superiority of the proposed method are verified by an example. The results show that the IGAHP-CRITIC combination weighting method can effectively integrate the subjective and objective weight information. Optimization of indicators can reduce the dimensions and complexity of the assessment. The improved ER method considering evidence conflict can effectively reduce the uncertainty and incompleteness of the assessment.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

安进,徐廷学,曾翔,等.组合赋权下的装备质量状态信息融合评估方法[J].控制与决策,2018,33(9):1693-1698

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2018-09-06
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码