基于产量竞争的供应链RFID技术投资均衡与协调
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

(1. 上海海事大学物流研究中心,上海201306;2. 复旦大学管理学院,上海200433;3. 华东理工大学商学院,上海200237)

作者简介:

通讯作者:

E-mail: lhzhang@shmtu.edu.cn.

中图分类号:

TP273

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(71971137,71601114);中国博士后科学基金项目(2019T120307,2019M651404);中国科技部邮轮项目(2018-473).


Equilibrium strategies and coordination of RFID technology adoption in supply chain under cournot competition
Author:
Affiliation:

(1. Logistics Research Center,Shanghai Maritime University,Shanghai 201306,China;2. School of Management,Fudan University,Shanghai200433,China;3. School of Business,East China University of Science and Technology,Shanghai 200237,China)

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    以单制造商和单零售商组成的双渠道供应链为研究对象,基于供应链成员是否采用无线射频识别(radio frequency identification,RFID)技术,分别构建链上成员均不采用RFID(NN)、仅制造商采用RFID(AN)、仅零售商采用RFID(NA)以及链上成员均采用RFID(AA)四种情景下的收益模型,求解出相应的最优解,并探讨链上成员采用RFID的均衡策略.研究发现:双渠道供应链采用RFID的均衡策略取决于渠道竞争强度、收益共享系数及RFID标签成本.竞争强度较小时,供应链成员均倾向于采用RFID;反之,则仅零售商倾向于采用该技术.收益共享系数较高时,AA情景不会出现;反之,若制造商采用RFID,则AA为均衡策略.RFID标签成本较低(高)时,供应链成员倾向于采用(不采用)RFID技术.

    Abstract:

    This paper studies a dual channel supply chain that consists of a manufacturer and a retailer. Based on whether the supply chain partners adopt radio frequency identification(RFID), we accordingly set up the partners’ profit models under four scenarios: none of the partners adopts RFID(NN), only the manufacturer adopts RFID(AN), only the retailer adopts RFID(NA), and both of the partners adopt RFID(AA). We obtain the both of the partners’ optimal decision-variables and profits. Furthermore, we discuss the equilibrium strategies of RFID adoption in the dual-channel supply chain. The study shows that the equilibrium strategies of RFID adoption in the dual-channel supply chain depend on competition intensity, revenue-sharing coefficient and RFID tagging cost. The supply chain partners tend to adopt RFID with a low competition intensity, while only the retailer is inclined to adopt RFID with a high competition intensity. AA cannot be an equilibrium strategy with a high revenue-sharing coefficient, otherwise, AA is the equilibrium strategy if the manufacturer adopts RFID. The supply chain partners tend to adopt RFID with a low tagging cost while not to adopt RFID otherwise.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张李浩,吴志婷,范体军.基于产量竞争的供应链RFID技术投资均衡与协调[J].控制与决策,2020,35(10):2514-2520

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2020-08-28
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码