面向交通能源融合的路侧单元传输控制优化策略
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

1. 长安大学 电子与控制工程学院,西安 710064;2. 长安大学 特殊地区公路工程教育部重点实验室,西安 710064

作者简介:

通讯作者:

E-mail: qinwen@chd.edu.cn.

中图分类号:

TP273

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目(2021YFB2601401).


Optimization strategy of roadside units’ transmission control for transportation-energy integration
Author:
Affiliation:

1. School of Electronics and Control Engineering,Changán University,Xián 710064,China;2. Key Laboratory for Special Area Highway Engineering of Ministry of Education,Changán University,Xián 710064,China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    针对如何提高自供电路侧单元服务满足数量的问题,提出一种在自供电路侧单元平均能效约束下最大化满足车辆服务请求数量的传输控制策略.该策略按照待服务车辆权重次序以车辆位置和能量队列长度为系统状态作出传输控制决策.通过建立自供电路侧单元传输控制决策的马尔可夫链模型,对服务过程中平均完成请求数和平均能效进行分析,进而提出一个非线性优化问题并求解,获得最优传输控制策略及其调度参数.仿真结果表明,上述自供电路侧单元最优传输控制策略具有位置状态和能量状态的双门限结构,相比于贪婪策略和Q- learning方法分别在能效方面平均提升了20.55%与11.86%,在服务稳定性方面,相比于其他两种策略,停电概率与不服务概率分别平均下降了20.03%与15.14%,具有能效和稳定性上的优势.

    Abstract:

    Aiming at the problem of how to improve the service satisfaction quantity of the self-powered roadside unit, a transmission control strategy to maximize the number of satisfied vehicle service requests under the constraint of average energy efficiency is proposed. The strategy makes the transmission scheduling decision with the vehicle position and the energy queue length of the self-powered roadside unit as the system state according to the weight order of the vehicles to be served. By establishing a Markov chain model for self-powered roadside unit transmission scheduling decisions, the average number of requests completed and the average energy efficiency in the service process are analyzed, and a nonlinear optimization problem is proposed and solved to reveal the optimal transmission control strategy and its scheduling parameters. The simulation results show that the obtained transmission control strategy of self-powered roadside unit has a double threshold structure with position state and energy state. It has the advantages of energy efficiency and stability. Compared with the greedy strategy and Q-learning algorithm, the energy efficiency is increased by 20.55% and 11.86% respectively. In terms of service stability, compared with the other two strategies, the outage probability and non service probability are reduced by 20.03% and 15.14% respectively.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

代亮,张金龙,秦雯.面向交通能源融合的路侧单元传输控制优化策略[J].控制与决策,2023,38(12):3354-3362

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-11-13
  • 出版日期: 2023-12-20
文章二维码