考虑公平偏好的低值可回收物回收处置激励机制研究
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

福州大学

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

F252

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金项目


Research on incentive mechanism of recycling and disposal of low-value waste materials considering fairness preference
Author:
Affiliation:

Fuzhou University

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    由地方政府委托回收商回收处置低值可回收物的委托代理系统中, 回收商的能力类型和努力水平是其私有信息, 导致了双重不对称信息问题, 而回收商的公平偏好也对地方政府委托合同的实施效果产生影响. 本文考虑双重信息不对称下回收商具有横向公平偏好的激励机制设计问题, 构建了完全理性、劣势和占优不公平偏好下的低值可回收物回收处置系统的激励机制模型, 刻画了最优的契约特征. 研究表明: 劣势不公平偏好下以按量补贴为主有助于抵消嫉妒负效用的影响, 激励回收商付出最佳努力水平; 而在占优不公平偏好下, 回收商接受契约的收益高于同行业平均收益, 此时应转变为以固定补贴为主, 保证回收商的基本利益更能调动回收商积极性. 同时发现, 在提供的最优契约下, 回收商的劣势不公平偏好强度越高或占优不公平偏好强度越低, 低值可回收物的的回收处置越充分, 委托代理双方收益越高.

    Abstract:

    In the principal-agent system where local governments commission recyclers to recycle and dispose of low-value recyclables, the recycler’s capacity type and effort level are their private information, resulting in the problem of double asymmetric information. The recycler’s fairness preference also has an impact on the implementation effect of the local government’s commission contract. This paper considers the design problem of incentive mechanism for recyclers with horizontal fairness preference under double asymmetric information, builds incentive mechanism models for the recycling and disposal system of low-value recyclables under complete rationality, disadvantageous and dominant unfairness, characterizing the optimal contract characteristics. The results show that: subsidies based on quantity under disadvantageous unfairness can help offset the negative effects of jealousy and motivate recyclers to put in the best effort level. While under the dominant unfairness preference, the recycler’s income from accepting the contract is higher than the average income in the same industry. At this time, it should be changed to a fixed subsidy as the main method to ensure the basic interests of recyclers, which can better mobilize the enthusiasm of recyclers. At the same time, it is found that under the optimal contract provided, the higher the intensity of the recycler’s disadvantageous unfairness preference or the lower the intensity of the recycler’s dominant unfairness preference, the more sufficient the recycling and disposal of low-value recyclables, and the higher the profits of both the principal and the agent.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-26
  • 最后修改日期:2024-08-13
  • 录用日期:2024-05-09
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-07-02
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码